Carlos De Oliveira : Mar-a-Lago Co-Defendant Seeks Dismissal in Documents Case | Trump’s Ally Fights Charges

Lawyers representing Carlos De Oliveira, a former maintenance chief at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club, have made a bold move in the ongoing criminal case involving the retention of classified documents. They have requested a federal judge to dismiss the obstruction of justice and false statement charges against De Oliveira.

Background: Mar-a-Lago Club in Florida

Mar-a-Lago, located in Palm Beach, Florida, is a luxurious private club owned by former President Donald Trump. The club has been at the center of controversy due to its involvement in the alleged deletion of security footage showing classified documents being moved out of a storage room.

Arguments for Dismissal

In a 19-page court filing, De Oliveira’s lawyers argued that their client was unaware of a grand jury subpoena issued for the footage and the compliance obligations it entailed. They also requested a more detailed breakdown of the obstruction charges from special counsel prosecutors.

Challenges Ahead

Despite the motion to dismiss, De Oliveira’s defense team faces an uphill battle as the judge typically defers to a jury on matters of fact. The presiding judge, Aileen Cannon, may take time to consider the filing before making a decision.

Key Allegations

The superseding indictment filed last year alleges that De Oliveira participated in concealing Trump’s attempt to retain classified documents, leading to the deletion of surveillance footage. The footage showed Trump’s valet removing boxes from the storage room.

Final Arguments

De Oliveira’s lawyers contended that their client’s actions did not constitute obstruction of justice as he was unaware of the subpoena and compliance requirements. They also challenged the allegation of lying to the FBI, stating that De Oliveira had no real involvement in the incident.

Upcoming Filings

In addition to De Oliveira’s motion, Trump’s legal team is expected to file motions to dismiss the charges based on presidential immunity and claims of selective and vindictive prosecution. These filings are anticipated to shed more light on the legal battle surrounding the classified documents case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!