by DC Superior Court Judge Anthony Epstein has ruled that there is probable cause in a homicide case, involving the fatal stabbing of Regina Morris. The suspect, Reginald Jones, has been charged with second-degree murder while armed. The incident took place on May 28, 2023, at the unit block of Potomac Avenue, SE, and Morris passed away from her injuries the following day.
According to court documents, Morris’ body was discovered in the apartment she shared with Jones, with numerous stab wounds to her face, head, back, arms, and hands. Jones voluntarily turned himself in to the Metropolitan Police Department on June 8 and was subsequently arrested.
During the hearing, the prosecution presented the lead detective for the case, who provided testimony regarding Jones’ alleged involvement in the stabbing. The detective introduced court documents detailing the series of events leading up to the incident and another set of documents discussing a mobile app used in the investigation.
One significant piece of evidence was the use of the Latch smart lock app, which captures photos of residents whenever they unlock a door. The detective stated that the app captured Jones accessing the elevator and garage of the building where Morris’ body was found. The prosecution argued that no other individuals had access to the apartment except Morris and Jones.
Jones’ defense attorney, Madalyn Harvey, argued that the judge should consider factors such as Jones’ age, health issues, and the fact that he turned himself in when deciding whether he should be placed in home confinement. However, the prosecution contended that someone who committed such a brutal crime should remain incarcerated. Judge Epstein agreed, stating that no accommodation could adequately protect the community from Jones.
Judge Epstein determined that the evidence provided by the prosecution was more than sufficient to establish probable cause. A felony status conference has been scheduled for May 17.
This tragic incident highlights the importance of thorough investigations and the use of technology in criminal cases. It also raises questions about the appropriate response to heinous crimes and the balance between individual circumstances and community safety.
